As the 2024/25 Premier League season comes to an end, the league’s 20 clubs collectively spent a staggering £409.1 million on intermediaries, firmly establishing the influential role these representatives play in player transfers and contract negotiations. This substantial figure underscores the financial power wielded by agents in modern football and the readiness of top-flight English clubs to invest heavily in securing player acquisitions and retaining key talent.
Premier League Agent Fees Cross the £400 Million Mark in 2024/25 Season

The sheer volume of money directed towards agents highlights their critical function in facilitating player movement and negotiating contracts. Premier League clubs, driven by intense competition and the relentless pursuit of success, seemingly consider these fees an essential component of acquiring and maintaining a competitive edge.
History of Premier League Agent Fees
While a comprehensive historical analysis of Premier League agent fees from its inception requires more extensive data, the available information provides valuable context for recent years. In the 2022/23 season, Premier League clubs collectively spent over £318 million on agent fees. Notably, Manchester City emerged as the top spender in that season, allocating £51.5 million to agents. This figure highlights a substantial increase in overall spending from £318 million in 2022/23 to over £409 million in the subsequent two seasons, indicating a clear upward trajectory in agent fee expenditure within the league.
This significant rise in agent fees over a relatively short period could be attributed to factors such as increased transfer activity, escalating player valuations, and potentially greater negotiating leverage for agents.
The 2023/24 season saw a further surge in total spending, reaching £409.5 million. In this season, Chelsea topped the spending charts with an impressive £75.1 million directed towards agents. Chelsea’s consistent pattern of high spending in the last two seasons, even with a slight reduction in 2024/25, suggests a deliberate strategic shift under their new ownership, characterized by a significant restructuring of their playing squad. The considerable outlay by Chelsea, particularly in 2023/24, likely reflects a period of intense transfer activity as the new ownership aimed to reshape the team, inevitably involving substantial agent involvement and associated fees.
The fact that the Premier League’s total agent fee expenditure in 2024/25, while marginally lower than the previous year, remains considerably higher than the £318 million spent in 2022/23 reinforces the trend of increasing agent fees within the league over the recent past. This sustained high level of spending, even with a minor dip, indicates that agent fees have become a major and enduring financial aspect of Premier League club operations, driven by the highly competitive nature of the league and the significant financial stakes involved in player acquisitions.
Advertisement
Top 5 Years of Premier League Spending on Agents
Based on the available data, the top years for Premier League spending on agent fees in recent history are:
- 2023/24: £409.5 million
- 2024/25: £409.1 million
- 2022/23: Over £318 million
- 2021/22: £272.6 million
Identifying the fifth-highest spending year would require access to a more comprehensive historical data set. However, the data clearly indicates a significant escalation in agent fee expenditure in the Premier League over the past few seasons.
Advertisement
Premier League Agent Fees Breakdown: Which Club Spent the Most on Agent Fees This Season
The distribution of agent fee spending across the 20 Premier League clubs in the 2024/25 season reveals significant disparities.
Rank | Club | Agent Fees (£ million) |
1 | Chelsea | 60.4 |
2 | Manchester City | 52.1 |
3 | Manchester United | 33.0 |
4 | Aston Villa | 25.1 |
5 | Newcastle United | 24.4 |
6 | Arsenal | 22.8 |
7 | Liverpool | 20.8 |
8 | West Ham United | 19 |
9 | Tottenham Hotspur | 18.4 |
10 | Brighton and Hove Albion | 16.6 |
11 | AFC Bournemouth | 16.4 |
12 | Brentford | 14.8 |
13 | Wolverhampton Wanderers | 13.5 |
14 | Nottingham Forest | 13.0 |
15 | Fulham | 12.8 |
16 | Crystal Palace | 12.0 |
17 | Leicester City | 9.8 |
18 | Everton | 9.2 |
19 | Southampton | 8.9 |
20 | Ipswich Town | 6.3 |
- Chelsea: Topping the list with £60.4 million, their high expenditure reflects ongoing squad reconstruction.
- Manchester City: Spending £52.1 million, consistent with their strategy of maintaining a competitive squad.
- Manchester United: In third place with £33.0 million, despite a season that fell way short of expectations.
- Aston Villa: Allocating £25.1 million, aligning with their ambitions for European qualification.
- Newcastle United: With £24.4 million, it shows a significant increase in spending under new ownership.
- Arsenal: Spent £22.8 million as they continued to build on recent progress.
- Liverpool: Their outlay of £20.8 million came in a season where they ended up winning the league title.
- West Ham United: Paid £19.0 million in agent fees.
- Tottenham Hotspur: Their expenditure amounted to £18.4 million.
- Brighton & Hove Albion: Spent £16.6 million, continuing their shrewd approach in the transfer market.
- AFC Bournemouth: Their spending reached £16.4 million.
- Brentford: Allocated £14.8 million to agents.
- Wolverhampton Wanderers: Spent £13.5 million on intermediaries.
- Nottingham Forest: Their agent fee expenditure was £13.0 million.
- Fulham: Paid £12.8 million in agent fees.
- Crystal Palace: Their outlay on agents was £12.0 million.
- Leicester City: Spent £9.8 million in a season that ultimately ended in relegation.
- Everton: Their agent fee expenditure was £9.2 million.
- Southampton: Spent £8.9 million, also relegated.
- Ipswich Town: As the lowest spender with £6.3 million, their limited budget likely played a role in their relegation.
Advertisement
What Has Been the Return on Investment for Each Premier League Team This Season?

Analyzing the return on investment for each Premier League team requires considering their agent fee spending in relation to their on-field performance, specifically their final league position and any major trophies won during the 2024/25 season. The Premier League final standings as of May 6th, 2025, provide a snapshot of their league performance.
Agent Fee Rank | Club | Agent Fees (£ million) | Final League Position (as of 6/05/25) | Major Trophies Won |
1 | Chelsea | 60.4 | 5th | Europa League (Quarter-Finals) |
2 | Manchester City | 52.1 | 3rd | FA Cup (Final) |
3 | Manchester United | 33.0 | 15th | Europa League (Semi-Finals) |
4 | Aston Villa | 25.1 | 7th | FA Cup (Semi-Finals), Conference League Play-off |
5 | Newcastle United | 24.4 | 4th | EFL Cup |
6 | Arsenal | 22.8 | 2nd | Champions League (Semi-Finals) |
7 | Liverpool | 20.8 | 1st | Won the 24/25 Premier League |
8 | West Ham United | 19.0 | 17th | |
9 | Tottenham Hotspur | 18.4 | 16th | |
10 | Brighton and Hove Albion | 16.6 | 10th | |
11 | AFC Bournemouth | 16.4 | 8th | FA Cup (Quarter-Finals) |
12 | Brentford | 14.8 | 9th | |
13 | Wolverhampton Wanderers | 13.5 | 13th | |
14 | Nottingham Forest | 13.0 | 6th | FA Cup (Semi-Finals) |
15 | Fulham | 12.8 | 11th | FA Cup (Quarter-Finals) |
16 | Crystal Palace | 12.0 | 12th | FA Cup (Final) |
17 | Leicester City | 9.8 | 19th | |
18 | Everton | 9.2 | 14th | |
19 | Southampton | 8.9 | 20th | |
20 | Ipswich Town | 6.3 | 18th |
Newcastle United, who spent £24.4 million on agent fees (5th highest), secured the EFL Cup, marking their first domestic trophy since 1955. This could be interpreted as a positive return on their investment in this instance. The FA Cup final is yet to be contested between Crystal Palace and Manchester City. The outcome of this competition will provide further insights into the correlation between agent fee spending and trophy success for the two teams.
In the UEFA Champions League, Arsenal, who spent £22.8 million on agents (6th highest), reached the semi-finals. Their progress in the competition, despite not being among the top spenders on agent fees, might suggest a more efficient approach to recruitment. Chelsea (£60.4 million, 1st) and Manchester United (£33.0 million, 3rd) both reached the quarter-finals and semi-finals of the UEFA Europa League, respectively. Their performance in this competition will be relevant when evaluating the effectiveness of their high agent fee spending.
Analyzing the league standings, Liverpool, who spent £20.8 million on agent fees (7th highest), have been crowned the 24/25 Premier League champions, indicating a potentially strong return on their investment in terms of league performance. Arsenal, with an agent fee expenditure of £22.8 million (6th highest), are also performing exceptionally well in the league, currently in second place, and have progressed to the Champions League semi-finals.
Manchester City, despite being the second-highest spender on agents, are in 3rd place, which might be considered a less than optimal return compared to their significant financial outlay. Manchester United, the third-highest spender on agent fees, find themselves in 15th position, suggesting a poor return on their investment in terms of league performance. Chelsea, the top spender on agent fees, is in 5th place and out of the Europa League quarter-finals, which could be viewed as a poor return given their substantial expenditure.
At the other end of the spectrum, Ipswich Town, the lowest spender on agent fees, are relegated, which aligns with expectations given their financial constraints. Similarly, Leicester City and Southampton, who also spent relatively less on agent fees, are relegated. Nottingham Forest, with a relatively modest agent fee spend (£13.0 million, 14th), are surprisingly in 6th position, suggesting a very high return on their investment.
Advertisement
Conclusion: The Persistent Cost of Premier League Agent Fees
The 2024/25 season once again underscored the significant financial influence of football agents in the Premier League, with clubs collectively exceeding £400 million in fees paid to intermediaries. This substantial expenditure highlights the enduring importance of agents in facilitating player transfers and negotiating contracts within the modern game. While there was a marginal decrease in overall spending compared to the previous season, the total figure remains considerably higher than in earlier years, confirming a clear upward trend in agent fee expenditure within the Premier League.
The distribution of this spending varied significantly among clubs, with Chelsea and Manchester City leading the way in outlay, while newly promoted clubs like Ipswich Town operated with considerably more constrained budgets.
The continuing trend of escalating agent fees in the Premier League raises important questions about the long-term financial sustainability of such high expenditures and their potential impact on the overall financial health of clubs. The significant sums directed towards agents, rather than directly into club infrastructure or player development, warrant ongoing scrutiny.
The data from the 2024/25 season further fuels the debate surrounding the role and regulation of football agents, suggesting that increased oversight and potential reforms may be necessary to foster a more balanced and transparent financial environment within football.
Advertisement
FAQs
How much do Premier League Agents earn?+
How much do Premier League teams get per position?+
Who is the highest-paid football agent?+
Why do football clubs pay agents?+
Is there a cap on football agent fees?+
However, the implementation and legality of these caps have faced challenges in some regions, with an English FA tribunal ruling parts of FIFA's regulations, particularly the fee cap, as breaching competition law in the UK.
Which club spent the most money in the Premier League?+
Trending