- Cristiano Ronaldo took his tally to 966 career goals with a brace.
- Kingsley Coman and Gabriel scored a goal each in this game.
- The hosts exceeded their xG of 2.87 with quite ease.
Al Nassr 4-0 Al Hazem Player Ratings: Ronaldo Shines Once Again With a Brace In a Four-Goal Rout Against Al Hazem
-1771707380740.webp)
Summary
Al Nassr saw off 12th-placed Al Hazem at home to clinch all three points in a Saudi Pro League fixture. It was expected that Jorge Jesus' men would dominate the game and rightly so, giving the opponent little to no opportunities on the attacking front.
Al Nassr controlled the game well overall, keeping the ball with them and playing it around the park with ease. Al Hazem did get a few chances, but they were rather wasteful and didn't make use of the errors made by Al Nassr.
One of the best Portuguese players of all time, Cristiano Ronaldo, scored the opening goal from a tight angle in the 13th minute, but the linesman had his flag up already. A VAR check followed, which reversed the decision to award a goal in the legendary forward's favour.
At the 30th-minute mark, Kingsley Coman doubled the lead for the hosts, from a nicely threaded through ball from another Portuguese, Joao Felix. Gabriel joined the party in the 77th minute with the third goal, while Ronaldo hit a left-footed belter from inside the box to make it four on the day for the home side and two for him on the day.
Al Hazem tried to make something happen out of thin air, but they were largely inferior to the Men in Yellow.
Here are the Al Nassr vs Al Hazem Player Ratings.
Key Takeaways
- Al Nassr had 58% possession, with an xG of 2.07, having the upper hand in the match in turn.
- Cristiano Ronaldo scored his 966th career goal, and his finish complemented the milestone.
- Aboubacar Bah won the most ground duels (7) in the game.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Final Score | Al Nassr 4–0 Al Hazem |
| Competition | Saudi Pro League |
| Date | 21st February, 2026 |
| MOTM (Player of the Match) | Cristiano Ronaldo (9.0/10) |
| Best Performer (Al Nassr) | Cristiano Ronaldo (9.0/10) |
| Best Performer (Al Hazem) | Aboubacar Bah (7.0/10) |
| Worst Performer (Al Nassr) | Ayman Ahmed (6.0/10) |
| Worst Performer (Al Hazem) | Abdulaziz Al-Harbi (5.0/10) |
Al Nassr Player Ratings vs Al Hazem
Check out the Al Nassr Player Ratings from the Al Nassr vs Al Hazem Player Ratings.
| Player | Rating |
|---|---|
| Bento | 6.0/10 |
| Al Ghanam | 6.5/10 |
| Simakan | 7.0/10 |
| Al Amri | 6.5/10 |
| Ahmed | 6.0/10 |
| Coman | 8.5/10 |
| Brozovic | 7.0/10 |
| Gabriel | 8.0/10 |
| Mane | 7.0/10 |
| Felix | 7.5/10 |
| Ronaldo | 9.0/10 |
Al Hazem Player Ratings vs Al Nassr
Check out the Al Hazem Player Ratings from the Al Nassr vs Al Hazem Player Ratings.
| Player | Rating |
|---|---|
| Zaied | 6.5/10 |
| Al-Harbi | 5.0/10 |
| Tanker | 5.5/10 |
| Boutouil | 5.5/10 |
| Al-Shamrani | 5.5/10 |
| Rosier | 6/10 |
| Bah | 7.0/10 |
| Al Dhuwayi | 6.5/10 |
| Oumarou | 6.0/10 |
| Al Habashi | 6.5/10 |
| Al Somah | 6.0/10 |
Man of the Match
Cristiano Ronaldo was arguably the player of the match in this Saudi Pro League fixture.
Worst Performer
Abdulaziz Al-Harbi was the worst performer in the Al Nassr vs Al Hazem game.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the scoreline in Al Nassr vs Al Hazem?
+
What was the scoreline in Al Nassr vs Al Hazem?
Al Nassr secured a comfortable 4-0 win over Al Hazem.
When was Al Nassr vs Al Hazem?
+
When was Al Nassr vs Al Hazem?
Al Nassr vs Al Hazem match was on 21st February, 2026.
Who was the best player in Al Nassr vs Al Hazem?
+
Who was the best player in Al Nassr vs Al Hazem?
The best player in Al Nassr vs Al Hazem was Cristiano Ronaldo, as he scored a brace to get closer to the 1000 mark.
Who was the worst player in Al Nassr vs Al Hazem?
+
Who was the worst player in Al Nassr vs Al Hazem?
Abdulaziz Al-Harbi was the worst player on the pitch, giving away too many balls and unable to contain the wingers most of the time.
Conversation
(0 Comments)
Editor's Pick
Editor's Pick
-1771487482563.webp)
-1771488086511.webp)





-1771703299110.webp)

-1771703357651.webp)

-1771700281599.webp)
-1754988285871.webp)


