Arsenal Vs Hull City Player Ratings: Odegaard 8.5/10 as His Sole Strike Seals Tight 1-0 Win

Quick Summary Table

We watched this one at Emirates Stadium, and it felt like a classic grind-it-out Premier League clash. Arsenal kept probing but found an inspired Hull defence and an outrageous showing from their keeper. In the end, it took a sharp poacher’s finish from Martin Ødegaard to finally crack it and give Arsenal a 1-0 win.

From our perspective, the game swung on control versus chaos. Arsenal’s midfield trio gradually smothered Hull City’s counters, while the visitors threatened mainly from set pieces and crosses into the box. Watching live, we kept glancing at the stats, and they backed up what our eyes saw: constant Arsenal pressure, but Hull City stubbornly hanging on thanks to heroic defending and some desperate blocks.

What stood out to us was how much this felt like a proper Premier League war of attrition. Hull City’s back line threw themselves at everything, yet Arsenal’s wide creativity and Ødegaard’s intelligence eventually wore them down. If you want the full story, the numbers and the narrative from this match line up almost perfectly. Check out the Arsenal vs Hull City player ratings.

Arsenal Player Ratings vs Hull City

Here are the Arsenal player ratings from the Arsenal vs Hull City player ratings.

Goalkeeper

David Raya - 7.5: We noticed Raya’s composure never really wavered, even when Hull threatened from corners. He produced two key saves, especially the strong stop from Semi Ajayi’s header into the top corner. His passing out from the back stayed tidy with 90% accuracy and smart decisions under pressure. One thing that stood out to us was his willingness to claim high balls, easing pressure. From our perspective, he wasn’t busy for ninety minutes, but when called upon, he was sharp and assured.

Defenders

Gabriel - 7: Gabriel had some shaky aerial moments, yet his defensive presence still mattered a lot. Six clearances and a crucial blocked shot showed his willingness to step into danger. We noticed he struggled slightly against McBurnie’s physicality but grew stronger as the game settled. His passing was clean, with 93% accuracy helping Arsenal recycle possession. From our perspective, he did enough to justify a solid rating, even if it wasn’t flawless.

Jurriën Timber - 7.5: Timber quietly delivered one of those all-action full-back performances we always appreciate. Eight ball recoveries, two tackles won, and constant overlapping runs on the right gave Hull real problems. We noticed his link-up with Madueke, especially with crosses for Tzolis and later for Madueke himself. His decision-making in possession looked mature, rarely forcing risky passes. From our perspective, his energy and versatility were vital in pinning Hull back for long stretches.

Ezri Konsa - 7.5: Konsa’s display at the back oozed calmness and control. Seven clearances and two interceptions told the story of his reading of danger. We noticed he won every duel he engaged in, which fits his 100% duel success rate. On the ball, 96% passing with several progressive balls into the final third kept Arsenal’s shape flowing. From our perspective, he quietly dominated his side of the defence and rarely looked threatened.

Riccardo Calafiori - 7: Calafiori had a mixed evening but ultimately positive. He conceded a couple of corners under pressure, yet his five clearances were important. We noticed his advanced positioning at times, almost operating like an extra midfielder in possession. With 90% pass accuracy and a key pass, he contributed to Arsenal’s territorial dominance. From our perspective, his substitution felt more about freshness than performance; he did his job reasonably well.

Midfielders

Bruno Guimarães - 7.5: Bruno orchestrated much of Arsenal’s tempo from deeper positions. Over 100 touches and 82 accurate passes showed how central he was. We noticed his pressing shape and positional discipline, often cutting off Hull’s passing lanes. Defensively, three tackles and two blocked shots underlined his work rate. From our perspective, he combined steel and creativity nicely, even if he didn’t deliver the final killer ball.

Declan Rice - 7: Rice’s night was a mix of aggressiveness and slight frustration. He took three shots, forcing one big save and another close miss, which reflected his drive to take responsibility. We noticed his physical dominance in duels, winning the majority and bullying midfield opponents. At times he looked annoyed with himself for misplaced passes, judging by his body language. From our perspective, he set the platform before being replaced, a good but not outstanding shift.

Christos Tzolis - 7.5: Tzolis was lively, if occasionally wasteful. Four shots and several dribbles kept Hull’s left side constantly occupied. We noticed his movement inside from the wing, which created shooting lanes and free-kick opportunities. He drew multiple fouls and tested Tzolakis with a couple of on-target efforts. From our perspective, his end product could have been sharper, yet his overall threat level justified a strong rating.

Noni Madueke - 8.5: Madueke, for us, was Arsenal’s most consistently dangerous player and arguably one of the best on the pitch. Four chances created, four shots, and five successful dribbles tell a story of relentless intent. We noticed defenders backing off him, clearly wary of his direct running and quick feet. His crossing for Rice and Konsa from set pieces repeatedly put Hull under pressure. From our perspective, only a lack of a goal keeps him from a perfect rating; his performance was electric.

Martin Ødegaard - 8.5: Ødegaard wore the captain’s armband and played like someone obsessed with finding the breakthrough. Five chances created, countless touches in the final third, and one decisive goal from close range underline his influence. We noticed his constant scanning, pointing, and organising, almost coaching teammates through attacking patterns. Yes, he lost the ball often, but that came from trying ambitious passes and shots. From our perspective, that winning strike and his creative volume make him a man of the match.

Forwards

Kai Havertz - 6: Havertz had a frustrating evening and it showed in his body language. Three offsides and just 19 touches told the story of someone never quite in sync. We noticed him making decent runs, but timing and connection with Ødegaard and Madueke felt off. His hold-up play was patchy, and he never really threatened Tzolakis’ goal. From our perspective, the substitution on 63 minutes felt inevitable and fairly justified.

Substitutes

Mikel Merino - 7: Merino added calm control and late penalty-area presence when he came on for Rice. We noticed his smart positioning between Hull’s lines, receiving Ødegaard’s passes and recycling play. He forced Tzolakis into two good saves with well-timed headers and shots. Defensively, he even helped secure the lead by winning a crucial late free kick. From our perspective, he strengthened Arsenal’s grip in the final stages.

Viktor Gyökeres - 6.5: Gyökeres worked hard without quite finding the finishing touch. One strong shot on target tested Tzolakis, but his overall involvement was limited. We noticed his pressing and channel runs which stretched Hull’s tired back line. However, he didn’t link as fluidly with Ødegaard as we have sometimes seen. From our perspective, decent impact but not enough to change the rating dramatically.

Eberechi Eze - 6.5: Eze offered flair and unpredictability after replacing Tzolis. He fired one effort wild and saw another blocked from distance. We noticed his willingness to receive under pressure and turn quickly, unsettling Hull’s midfield briefly. Still, the final pass never really came off for him today. From our perspective, promising touches but slightly below what he can truly deliver.

Piero Hincapié - 6.5: Hincapié stepped in for Calafiori and maintained defensive security with little fuss. We noticed his confident carrying of the ball out of defence and a nice assist for Eze’s chance. Defensively, he stayed switched on against late Hull pressure from wide areas. From our perspective, a neat, low-drama cameo that kept Arsenal’s structure intact.

Martín Zubimendi - 6.5: Zubimendi came on very late, so we mainly judged him on game management. He recycled possession, closed passing lanes, and stayed disciplined in midfield. We noticed him tucking in alongside Merino to protect the back line. From our perspective, not enough time for a bigger rating, but he did nothing wrong.

Manager

M. Arteta - 7.5: Arteta stuck with a patient, control-based plan, trusting his midfield to grind Hull down. His timing of changes, especially bringing on Merino, Eze, and Gyökeres, refreshed the attack exactly when needed. We noticed him constantly barking instructions, particularly to Madueke and Timber on the right. From our perspective, he managed game momentum well, even if the final scoreline looked narrower than Arsenal’s dominance.

Hull City Player Ratings vs Arsenal

Have a look at the Hull City player ratings from the Arsenal vs Hull City player ratings.

Goalkeeper

Konstantinos Tzolakis - 8.4: Tzolakis was incredible, and honestly he kept the scoreline respectable almost single-handedly. Nine saves, seven inside the box, against constant pressure at Arsenal's home ground is outrageous. We noticed his reflexes, especially against Rice, Madueke, Merino, and Gyökeres, were razor sharp. His distribution was scruffy, but his shot-stopping more than compensated for that weakness.

Defenders

Lewie Coyle - 5.5: Coyle started as captain but struggled badly, especially in aerial duels. Winning just one of six aerials and picking up a yellow reflected his difficult night. We noticed him increasingly rash in challenges, late to tackles, and often dragged out of position. His early substitution felt like a mercy and a tactical decision combined. From our perspective, he was among Hull City’s weakest performers before coming off.

Semi Ajayi - 7.5: Before his injury, Ajayi put in a brave, physical shift. He defended the box ferociously with four clearances and three tackles, and even threatened Arsenal’s goal with two headed efforts. We noticed his last-man tackles and body-on-the-line blocks that kept Hull alive. It was a shame his evening ended prematurely after the injury delay. From our perspective, he can still leave with his head held high.

John Egan - 7: Egan battled hard against constant crosses and cutbacks. Four clearances, two blocked shots, and solid duel numbers show good defensive commitment. We noticed his organisation of the back line, often pointing teammates into position. He did concede the odd foul and allowed Ødegaard space once or twice. From our perspective, though, he contributed strongly to Hull City’s overall resilience.

Elliot Stroud - 5.5: Stroud’s evening was chaotic and his yellow card summed that up. Although he had a decent shot on target, his defensive work looked frantic. We noticed him diving into tackles, losing all seven duels, and struggling to contain Arsenal’s left side. The repeated fouls and eventual booking felt inevitable watching live. From our perspective, his substitution improved Hull’s stability slightly.

Nobel Mendy - 6: Mendy’s performance was a strange mix of heroics and clumsiness. Eleven clearances show huge defensive effort, constantly heading and hacking danger away. We noticed, though, that his fouls and late yellow reflected tired legs and mistimed challenges. On the ball he was limited, often opting for long clearances rather than passes. From our perspective, he did his best in difficult circumstances, but not flawlessly.

Midfielders

Regan Slater - 6.5: Slater contributed positively from set pieces early on, delivering dangerous crosses for Ajayi and Egan. We noticed his work rate, constantly shuttling between defence and attack to support transitions. Defensively his duels were mixed, but he at least tried to get close to Ødegaard. Some passes were loose, yet he still created two chances from wide areas. From our perspective, one of Hull’s more industrious midfielders.

Lucas Gourna-Douath - 6: Gourna-Douath was combative but a little reckless, especially around the yellow card incident. Two interceptions and seven ball recoveries showed his defensive nose. We noticed his repeated fouls and occasional late tackles which invited Arsenal pressure. On the ball, his passing was serviceable rather than inspiring. From our perspective, he fought hard but lacked the composure needed against such a strong midfield.

Tim Iroegbunam - 6: Iroegbunam had flashes of impact, including a blocked shot from a promising position. We noticed his energy and willingness to drive forward when Hull actually broke lines. However, he lost most of his duels and sometimes got caught ahead of the ball. His substitution felt like a tactical reshuffle more than a punishment. From our perspective, a mixed performance with effort but limited end product.

Forwards

Oli McBurnie - 6: McBurnie battled endlessly but rarely got meaningful service. Twelve duels with only three wins underline how tough his evening was against Arsenal’s centre-backs. We noticed his attempts to link play and assist teammates, including Stroud’s shot, but he lacked support. His aerial game, usually a strength, misfired here. From our perspective, effort high, effectiveness low, which influenced his rating.

Mohamed-Ali Cho - 5.5: Cho’s night was largely disappointing. Early offsides, multiple lost duels, and a blocked shot speak to limited influence. We noticed him drifting wide trying to find space but rarely beating Arsenal defenders. His cross for Ajayi’s header was one bright moment in an otherwise subdued performance. From our perspective, he needed more composure and sharper decision-making before being substituted.

Substitutes

Brooke Norton-Cuffy - 6: Norton-Cuffy came on and immediately got involved, even earning a yellow for a heavy challenge. We noticed his aggressive approach, pushing high from right-back to engage Madueke. At times, that aggression helped Hull win territory; at other times, it left space behind. He also conceded a couple of late fouls under pressure. From our perspective, energetic but slightly uncontrolled.

Lucas Herrington - 6: Herrington replaced the injured Ajayi and tried to maintain defensive solidity. We noticed him concede a corner under heavy pressure, yet generally hold his position fairly well. He lacked Ajayi’s authority in the air, which is understandable for a fresh substitute. From our perspective, he coped rather than excelled against tough attacking waves.

Ryan Giles - 6: Giles slotted in at left-back and focused mainly on defensive duties. We noticed his positioning was sensible, even if he conceded a corner during Arsenal pressure. He didn’t get forward much, limiting his attacking contribution. From our perspective, he did enough to help see out the game without further damage.

Joe Gelhardt - 6: Gelhardt came on for Cho but hardly saw the ball. We noticed his pressing intensity and willingness to chase lost causes, however. Hull rarely built sustained attacks, which left him starved of touches. From our perspective, impossible to judge too harshly, but he couldn’t change the flow.

Christos Mouzakitis - 6: Mouzakitis entered late and mostly helped in defending Arsenal’s final waves. We noticed him dropping deep, winning one or two simple free kicks to relieve pressure. With little chance to attack, his impact was restrained. From our perspective, a standard late-sub outing, functional but unspectacular.

Manager

S. Jakirović - 7: Jakirović set Hull City up to suffer without the ball and they followed his plan bravely. We noticed the compact defensive structure, reliance on set pieces, and commitment to blocking shots. His changes, especially bringing on fresh full-backs, aimed to maintain intensity in wide areas. From our perspective, his plan almost earned a point but was undone by one moment of quality from Ødegaard.